Shock of all shocks, Andrew Leigh, Big Hollywood blogger and Weekly Standard contributer, would rather watch a conservative movie than a liberal movie. I hope this doesn't challenge the current world order too much.
A preface, recently the National Review published a list of the Top 25 Conservative Movies of the Last 25 Years. The list fails for many reasons, most of which revolve around the fact that many of the movies listed are not conservative. So over on Daily Kos, I asked people to suggest movies and vote on an impromptu list of liberal movies. While the liberal list is not perfect (most people's choice vote lists miss out on good, lesser known stuff) it succeeds in one major point where the conservative list does not: every movie on the list is liberal.
However, Andrew Leigh posted a response on Big Hollywood to the Daily Kos list that I would like to address, as the person who set up it up. While I disagree with the majority of his post, there are two main criticisms that I take issue with, one of which deals with politics and one with entertainment.
Leigh writes:
One lefty blogger wrote, “In the end, right-wingers cannot excape [sic] from the fundamental fact that great art challenges assumptions and received wisdom and calls on us to look at the world with new eyes — and therefore is inherently progressive.”
If true, then the left’s claim on the arts is about to weaken. Because the “assumptions” and “received wisdom” of the Establishment these days are predominantly progressive.
This is false. The President and the Speaker of the House may be a progressive, but the Establishment with a capitol E most certainly is not. That is the nature of creating a "more perfect union." The countries problems weren't washed away on January 20th. The media and press corps, military, financial industry, etc. didn't magically change either. Gays still don't have civil unions in some places, let alone the right to marry. We are still in two wars. And there are injustices going on all around us. Further, some of the best liberal films of all time were produced during liberal or democratic administrations. To Kill a Mockingbird was produced in 1962 during the Kennedy administration, as was another liberal classic Dr. Strangelove.
William F. Buckley wrote that the mission of the National Review (and by extension, conservatism) is to:
It stands athwart history, yelling Stop, at a time when no one is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.
Liberalism, on the other hand, is a search for more rights and less injustice. As history progresses, we mark our victories and defeats, but liberalism marches forward always. There can never be an age when government catches up with liberalism, only when it tries to correct the injustices that liberals have already found. "Liberal government" or a "progressive government" merely participate with that march forward, whereas "conservative government" may deal with yesterday's battle while trying to stop the march into the future.
The conservative list is composed of battles: fighting against communism, fighting against oppression, tyranny, fighting against America's enemies, etc. Whereas the liberal list is composed of battles for a better country. When you define yourself as the opposition to historical movements, some will be good battles. Defeating communism=good. However, the country has changed since the fall of communism, and conservatism hasn't caught up. Conservatives never stop to wonder why they are not seen as defenders of liberty, or why a cry of 'freedom' doesn't have the same ring to it. Conservatism has become the oppressor in America, and the main form of tyranny at home, and the new freedoms Americans want are the kind that conservatives rally against.
My second objection is to the final paragraph in his post:
Looking over the Daily Kos list, however, one can’t help but notice that it seems relatively humorless (only two, maybe three comedies, versus five on the National Review roll) and didactic (six documentaries and five docudramas). So ask yourself, dear reader: assuming you had the means to watch DVDs, which group of movies would you rather have while stranded on a desert island?
The point was to pick the best films that have a liberal or conservative bent, and not which movies liberals or conservatives like the most. This is an important distinction, because liberals love movies like Pulp Fiction or Royal Tennenbaums. But those movies are NOT liberal, they just are the kind of movie a liberal would like. The final liberal list did come out with too many Michael Moore films, but because it was voted on I did not have the right to change it. However, I take it Leigh has never seen a Moore film, because if he had he'd know that they all automatically qualify as comedies. Comedic documentaries, maybe, but hilarious. I remember seeing Bowling for Columbine the first time, and it was a laugh a minute. Sicko, which was sold out the entire opening weekend here in Philly, is the same way. Moore has the ability to open eyes while being humorous. This is a pretty typical form of political comedy, akin to John Stewart, Stephen Colbert, SNL's skits, etc.
Finally, if I had to go to a desert island with some dvds, I would much rather watch Milk, A Few Good Men, and Good Morning, Vietnam than We Were Soldiers, Red Dawn, and Blast From the Past. Plus, I think all the liberal movies (hello The Lives of Others and Juno) that stumbled onto the conservative list would get to come too.
Subscribe to Pop Civics via RSS.
What is RSS?
Read more...